Printable Version
As always, your questions
show your deep desire to keep the mitzvot from a place of true connection.
Certain mitzvot are not easy to keep when we live in a secular environment.
From the time of the enlightenment period, when the Jews began to blend into
the general society, the kipah was exchanged with a cap and women’s hair
covering with an occasional doily. The ba’al teshuva movement beginning
in the late sixties wove new strands into the fabric of the mitzvah of women’s
hair covering. When I got married 36 years ago
in Jerusalem, I had no qualms about covering my hair. On the contrary, I was
excited to mark my entry into the realm of the married crowd with the crown of
Jewish womanhood – the long flowing headscarf. However, When I look around
today, I notice that not every woman in the orthodox camp share my enthusiasm
about hair covering. Lately, the newest
style has, in certain circles, reduced the mitzvah of women’s hair covering to
a symbolic hair-covering. Some signify matrimony with a headband rather than
using a proper hair covering. In our time at the verge of the final redemption,
our secular environment greatly challenges the Torah world. This challenge
prompts us delve deeper into the inner Torah (kabbalah) in order to truly
connect with the mitzvot.
Dear Rebbetzin Chana Bracha,
I’m
having serious issues with head coverings. I am trying to understand the
modesty aspect and I haven’t been able to find any place in the Torah that
states that married women have to cover their hair. How do we know that women
in the Bible actually covered their hair, perhaps the whole hair-covering
business is something the Rabbis, who were men, made up? Even if women in the
Torah did cover their hair, why would that imply that we must cover it now? If it is THAT important, why isn’t it implicit in the
Torah? Perhaps if I learned the deeper
meaning behind women’s hair-covering, perhaps if I could connect with some
underlying Kabbalistic reasons for married women’s hair-covering, then it may
be easier. Otherwise, I really can’t pull this off in in the long run. Whenever
I am around women who let their hair down, I don’t feel comfortable sticking
out, so I can’t help letting my hair-covering slip. If you could please shed
some light on this topic, it would mean a lot to me.
Ahuva Freeman (name changed)
Dear Ahuva,
Pre-wedding tichel party at B'erot! |
How do We Know that Married Women in the Bible Covered
their Hair?
Before giving
you a drop of Kabbalistic insights, I’d like to answer your question about how
we know that women in the Bible indeed covered their hair. The Talmud (Ketubot
72a) learns the fact that married women would keep their hair covered from a
passage describing the Sota – the woman who went astray. This woman,
suspected of adultery, is brought before the Kohen.
ספר במדבר פרק ה פסוק יח וְהֶעֱמִיד הַכֹּהֵן אֶת הָאִשָּׁה לִפְנֵי הָשֵׁם
וּפָרַע אֶת רֹאשׁ הָאִשָּׁה...
“Then the
Kohen makes the woman stand before Hashem and makes the woman’s head wild…” (Bamidbar
5:18).
Note that it
does not state, “Make the woman’s hair wild,” but rather, “make the
woman’s head wild.” How would it be possible to disarrange the head
of the woman any other way than by uncovering it? The root word, פָּרַע/para,
used to describe what the Kohen does to the woman’s head is mentioned numerous
times in the Bible. It usually means unrestrained, or uncovered. Thus Rashi
expounds on the verse, “Now Moshe saw that the people were uncovered (פרע/fara),
for Aaron had made them uncovered...” (Shemot 32:25), that the shame and
disgrace of the people were revealed. Regarding the suspected adulteress, Rashi
explains, AND HE SHALL PUT IN DISORDER [THE WOMAN’S HEAD] – i.e. he pulls apart
her hair plaits in order to make her look despicable. We may learn from this
that regarding [married] Jewish women, an uncovered head is a disgrace to them
(Siphre). (Rashi, Bamidbar 5:18). Since the whole procedure
describing the Sota aims at a scornful treatment of the woman who has by
her own conduct subjected herself to suspicion, it follows that it was regarded
as immodest for Jewish women to allow their hair to remain uncovered.
Why is Married Women’s
Hair-covering not Mentioned Directly in the Torah?
If it is so
important that married women cover their hair, why is it not written with an
explicit command in the Torah? Why does it not state anywhere in the Torah,
something like, ‘Every married woman must cover her hair’? Why must we learn
about this mitzvah indirectly from the story of the Sota (suspected
adulteress)? To answer this question, we need to understand that many important
Torah laws are not written directly in the Torah. Rather, they are learned out
through Talmudic exposition, based on the principles of the Torah. For example,
most of the laws of Shabbat are not specified in the Torah. The Talmud learns
the 39 forbidden creative works from the description of building the
Tabernacle. The Torah itself states only, “Don’t do any work.” The kinds of
prohibited works are not written directly in the Torah. Likewise, in regards to
the laws of modesty, the written Torah states only the general law that “your
camp shall be holy” and “you shall be holy.” It never states explicitly the
laws of modest dress for women. Only in the Oral Law does it specify that the
thighs, upper arms, and chest of a woman, and in the case of a married woman,
also her hair, are considered her private parts. These other parts of our body
that all women are commanded to cover, are not even hinted at in the Torah.
Only the hair-covering of a married woman is considered a law from the Torah,
based on our Torah verse regarding the sota (Babylonian Talmud,
Ketubot 72a; The Bach, Even Haezer 21).
Did the Rabbis Invent
the Mitzvah of Hair-Covering?
The fact that
many mitzvot are learned out through the Oral Law does not decrease their
importance. Many mitzvot, which most observant Jews regard as the core of
Judaism, are ‘only’ rabbinic- such as lighting the Shabbat and Chanukah candles,
hearing the Megillah on Purim and reciting blessings before eating
various foods. The Torah explicitly commands us to listen to the Torah
leadership (the Rabbis) (Devarim 17:11). The Oral Torah is handed down
in direct transmission from Sinai to Moshe. Therefore, the entire Torah legal
system is based on having faith in Rabbinical authority. Even if the rationale
of certain mitzvot are not always revealed to us, it is important to develop emunat
chachamim (faith in our sages), and humbly realize the limitations of our
own understanding. The rabbis didn’t just invent the mitzvah of hair-covering
in order to disparage married women and make their lives miserable. There are
deeper reasons for the importance of hair-covering for married women which is
emphasized in halacha, midrash and in the Zohar.
Protecting the Gates
of her Head
“From the hair
of a person you can know who he is…” (Zohar, Naso, Idra Rabbah 129a).
Long or short,
hair is very deep. It’s like the body and soul’s antennas transmitting energy
from a higher realm, while also exuding the deepest, most inner parts of one’s
being. The hair acts as conduits for our light and energy. I have seen
numerous young women changing as they learn Torah in our program. The first
thing to be affected when a person undergoes transformation is the hair. Hair
is even affected by our moods. It could change from frizzy to wavy, stand out
or lie flat. Rabbi Yehuda said, the hair
of the head of the [married] woman that is revealed causes another hair to be
revealed {that is the power of the sitra achra that clings to the hair}…
(Zohar Chelek 3, Daf
125b-126a). Rabbi Chaim Kramer, in Anatomy of the
Soul, explains that the Hebrew word for hair שער/sa’ar
has the same letters as the Hebrew word for שער/sha’ar
– gate. The hair of the head corresponds to the gates, for they are outside the
head, protecting all that is inside, as a gate protects a building from outsiders.
Before a woman is married, her ‘gates’ are open to allow the man of her life to
enter. A married woman, however, needs to close her ‘gates’ in order to guard
the holy union with her husband from every outside intruder. Even a woman who
is no longer married needs extra guarding of her ‘gates.’ Once her ‘gates’ have
been entered, and her private parts opened, she becomes vulnerable to
extraneous forces. Only the man who holds the key to her ‘gates’ must be
allowed in.
The Attraction of a
Woman’s Hair – Reserved for Her Husband
Our hair is very much an
expression of our inner soul. It is very alive and can be very attractive and
sexy. Even if it is not attractive, it still reveals something very deep from
within our soul, which for a married woman, is reserved for her husband alone.
You can be creative with the coverings, using several scarves in different
colors, tying them in new and creative ways. Of course, some women prefer a
fancy hat or even a wig. Hashem gave women the ability to attract a man with
our hair. Once we have attained our man, the attraction of our hair needs to be
hidden from men other than the one and only man in our life. It is something
special about us, which is just for our husband to enjoy.
No comments:
Post a Comment